Chapter 131 Let Me Tell You Directly, I Suspect You of Perjury!

Boom, boom, boom!

At the trial table, Wang Jianjun listened to Su Bai's statement.

He lowered his head and looked at the trial materials and evidence.

Then, he looked at the prosecutor's seat and said:

"Does the attorney ad litem of the accused party have anything to say about the issues raised by the litigants...?"

Directly put the pressure on Yan Xiang.

After Yan Xiang took a deep breath, he understood that he could not continue to talk about this topic or let the other party go deeper.

So he changed the topic directly and led the topic to other places.

"presiding judge."

"I do not agree with the litigants' views..."

"State your side of the story."

Wang Jianjun directly asked Yan to make a statement.

After Yan Xiangshang sorted out the information on his side, he then spoke:

"Based on statements from the litigant's attorneys."

"The litigant's lawyers are completely diverting the focus of Lin Haoxue's sentencing."

"First:"

"Based on the original evidence... it has been pointed out that all criminal suspects are on Lin Haoxue.

It was not stated by the litigant, but because Lin Haoxue discovered the victim's body, he was accused of being a criminal suspect. "

"But after a long period of screening and screening of many criminal suspects, it was determined that Lin Haoxue was the biggest criminal suspect at the time, thus confirming that he was a criminal suspect."

Yan explained this point to Shang Shang.

He directly denied Su Bai's accusation.

What Su Bai meant was that because Lin Haoxue discovered the female body, law enforcement identified him as a suspect, charged him, and handed him over to the prosecutor.

This matter, regardless of whether the original situation was like this or not.

But this cannot be admitted.

Otherwise, it will easily create the impression that the rules are violated and accusations are made at will.

By then it will definitely be a more troublesome thing.

So a rebuttal is necessary.

After explaining this point, Yan Xiang went on to answer other targeted questions raised by Su Bai.

continue:

"We also disagree with the fact that we did not have strong criminal evidence of Lin Haoxue but handed it over to the prosecutor as raised by the litigant."

"First:"

"Under the circumstances at that time, all evidence and suspicion have shown that Lin Manhao committed this crime."

"And there is Lin Manhao's confession."

"The facts of Lin Haoxue's crime have been confirmed by our side after repeated investigations and evidence searches.

It is our responsibility to hand it over to the prosecution.

As for confirming the evidence, it is the responsibility of the prosecutor. As for the verdict, it is the responsibility of the court and has nothing to do with us. "

"The litigant accuses us of negligent conduct, which we believe is unreasonable."

"Furthermore, according to the relevant provisions of the law, only through a court's judgment can it be determined that the criminal facts exist or do not exist."

"The court has not made a ruling yet. The litigant said that our policy was negligent in responding to Lin Haoxue's accusation. Are you directly challenging the definition of the law?"

"Why do you believe that Lin Haoxue is no longer a criminal? The court has not passed the verdict yet."

"As for the litigant's argument that we did not have strong evidence at the beginning, the presiding judge, we believe that the litigator used one-sided information to induce the direction of the trial."

“What the litigator said does not have strong evidence and is completely nonsense.”

"The fact that Lin Manhao was convicted of the crime at that time was that the victim's fingernails contained Lin Manhao's DNA."

"Isn't this strong evidence...?!"

In order not to take the blame, Yan Xiang directly passed the problem to other parties.

And he also asked Su Bai two questions.

Su Bai's eyes fell on Yan Xiangshang.

interesting.…

No wonder I'm sitting across from you today... just by asking these few questions.

Maybe some ordinary lawyers can’t handle it.

If you follow the other person's ideas.

indeed.

If such a judgment can be made, the public prosecutor, the prosecutor and the law all have certain responsibilities.

After all, all three parties are related.

Of course.

Su Bai didn't know whether Yan Xiang said this on purpose.

The high probability should be...tell him not to ask only one party?

Look elsewhere?

Su Bai didn't know if there was any other meaning in these words.

It's just that... these words are not very friendly to the members of the collegial panel at the trial seat.

If you plead, just plea, why bring in other parties? Want to clear up the responsibility relationship?

Wang Jianjun:? ? ?

I don't care if there is any other meaning.

Do you think you can influence my judgment like this?

According to the legal facts, I will decide whatever I want!

If you lose the defense at trial, is there any problem with the verdict that you lose?

How else could the High Court let me, the vice president, decide this case?

After Wang Jianjun heard Yan Xiang's plea, he felt a little unhappy.

However, this did not affect Tai Dui's subjective judgment on the trial.

Just one sentence, how to judge how to judge! .

….…

However... faced with Yan Xiang's questioning.

Su Bai was silently happy.

You started this topic yourself...

I originally wanted to stay behind and talk, but since you said so, I have no choice but to follow your wishes.

yes!

There is indeed Lin Manhao's DNA in the fingernails of the victim woman. If so, it is indeed strong evidence.

But you can accuse a person of a crime with just one piece of evidence? !

Why? !

What does the legal definition say? !

Can DNA verification alone be used to determine a person’s crime?

You have no idea where this DNA came from?

After the trial progresses to this point, the defense and progress of both parties will depend entirely on the evidence and whether the evidence complies with the rules of procedure.

Boom!

“The litigants are invited to make their representations.”

"Good judge."

Su Bai said: "Excuse me, the prosecution. You said that you interviewed many people and identified many suspects. Is there any evidence to prove it?"

"Also, we did not conduct a one-sided trial to induce the trial. The strong evidence mentioned by the prosecution refers to the DNA test report."

"For general purposes, the DNA identification report is indeed a strong piece of evidence."

"But according to the Criminal Procedure Law, Article 50 stipulates the meaning of evidence and the legal categories."

"Which states:"

“Materials that can be used to prove the facts of a case are all evidence, including physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, victim statements, criminal suspects and defendants’ confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, inspections, inspections, identifications, investigative experiments, etc. Transcripts, as well as audio-visual materials and electronic data, etc.”

"DNA testing is evidence, but according to Article 50 of the Criminal Procedure Law, there are clear regulations on the scope of application of evidence."

"The evidence must be verified to be true before it can be used as the basis for finalizing the case. The result of the appraisal is not the final conclusion. It still needs to be reviewed and judged by the relevant departments through the judicial authorities in conjunction with the entire case and other evidence. Only after it is verified to be true can it be used as the basis for finalizing the case."

"However, in this case, during the review stage, the facts were not directly determined in combination with other evidence. The factual basis for Lin Haoxue's crime was determined directly through the DNA test report. This is obviously inconsistent with the legal basis."

"at the same time."

"According to the statement of our client Lin Haoxue, he had already stated and explained the source of the blood marks on his body at that time."

"The criminal suspect's statement is a key source of evidence."

"When evidence conflicts, according to the provisions of the law, the truth should be verified. In other words, the source of the blood marks on Lin Haoxue needs to be verified to confirm that the DNA identification report is correct."

"Just relying on a piece of DNA evidence does not represent strong evidence."

"Similarly, if only one DNA evidence was produced without verifying the suspect's statement, which is a procedural violation, how can one determine that the DNA report is accurate?"

"In other words, we question the legitimacy of the source of the DNA report!"

.

….

Now, we are beginning to directly question the authenticity of the evidence.

Su Bai explained from the legally defined types of evidence to the interpretation and application of the guidance of the Supreme Court of Justice.

Combine the cases again.

The last sentence formed a killer sentence.

Without considering the entire case, how can we identify a criminal suspect based solely on a DNA report?

In any case, it can only be said that DNA is used as the main evidence, not the only evidence.

Since the criminal suspect has put forward his own explanation, it needs to be verified. Only after verification can the next step of trial and judgment be carried out.

It's okay if the criminal suspect can't produce any other evidence or explanation.

With explanations and refutations.

The criminal suspect has begun to question the origin of your DNA.

If you still talk about DNA, then I will question the authenticity of the source of your DNA report!

Su Bai originally planned to mention this point later.

But he didn't expect Yan Xiang to bring it up directly, so he was not polite and just went on with it.

Actually.

From the files and evidence.

Su Bai has always had doubts about this DNA test.

You've done the DNA test, and you've already established Lin Haoxue's criminal facts.

Do you still care about spending so much time to verify the source of the blood marks Lin Manhao said?

Normally not!

To know.

Failure to verify the relevant important testimony provided by the criminal suspect is already a major violation in terms of process.

If the lawyer raises the issue in court, the court will basically determine that there is insufficient evidence for the accusation and the prosecutor will lose the case.

The main evidence is there.

You still worked so hard and insisted on violating the rules?

Among them, if there is no problem, who will believe it?

This is mutual supervision among the three parties!

Don’t you know there is such a big process loophole?

It’s impossible not to know…

It's impossible not to know...such a problem has arisen again.

Tsk tsk tsk.…

What is this if it's not an unjust, false or wrongly decided case? !

.

….…

After Su Bai asked the question, Yan suddenly broke into a cold sweat while swiping his hands behind his back.

This question... is indeed a difficult question.

.

….…

at the same time.

Outside the court hearing, in Luo Daxiang's live broadcast room, many enthusiastic friends left messages and comments.

"Good guy, I call you good guy, isn't this the most exciting part yet?"

"Hahaha!"

"This question is absolutely perfect. It directly questions the source of the evidence. If this is not handled well, I think the career of the accused lawyer will be over."

"Based on Lawyer Su's question, I think there is indeed a certain problem with this. Otherwise, Lawyer Su would not have asked it directly."

"But this time, I think the prosecution lawyer got himself involved. If he didn't bring up some DNA, Lawyer Su might not question this point."

"But if I raise it now and the other party doesn't answer well, my career will be over in terms of legal fees."

"Indeed... When I first heard the question raised by the accused lawyer, I was still wondering if Lawyer Su had overturned this time. Now it seems that I was ignorant. It turns out that Lawyer Su was Waiting for this to come out!”

"Hahaha!"

"I thought so too at first, but then I thought about it, how could Lawyer Su overturn because of this!"

"Lawyer Su: Damn it, the lawyer opposite is giving you a big gift!"

"Hahaha……."

"Teacher Luo, what do you think of this trial? Is there anything wrong with it?"

"Yes, yes, Teacher Luo, what do you think?"

“….…”

Facing the fans' inquiries, Luo Daxiang smiled and said: "At present, the litigant has a certain advantage, but the details still need to be further confirmed through court trials."

Luo Daxiang's words were a little vague, but in his heart he had already determined that there were certain problems with this case.

But he is live broadcasting...

The trial has not ended yet, so we certainly cannot directly say that this case was a wrong one.

at the same time.

Jiangdu, in a certain community.

After hearing Su Bai's question, Hu Yulong was stunned for a moment.

Watching the live broadcast of the trial.

No...is this question so pointed?

What happened to Yan Xiang?

The lawsuit ended like this!

The questioning was quite good at first, but later on the other party turned the other side.

What's going on?

Hu Yulong rubbed his brows with an irritated look and stared closely at the live broadcast of the trial.

There can be no problems in this case!

otherwise.…

Hu Yulong couldn't help but shudder when he thought of the consequences...

But he can't do anything now and can only place his hope on Yan Xiang.

I hope I can refute it.

Hu Yulong looked nervous and said nothing more.

at the same time.

Kong Jiantu, who was sitting at the prosecutor's seat, couldn't help but secretly feel lucky when faced with Su Bai's aggressive statement.

so far so good.…

Fortunately, he didn't get involved in this matter.

Otherwise, after this trial ends, his identity as a prosecutor will be lost.

Not only will it be lost, but it may also cause other unexpected things...

hiss.…

The top criminal lawyers in the country are indeed awesome!

Kong Jiantu thought silently in his heart, and also hinted that he must be cautious in his words and deeds in the future.

If you can speak, speak less, but if you can't speak, don't speak at all.

call.…..

….…

At the court hearing.

Yan Xiangshang had already adjusted his emotions and raised his head slightly to look at the court hearing table.

Li Xuezhen looked at Yan Xiang with excitement.

When he noticed eyes falling on him, Yan looked towards Li Xuezhen subconsciously.

? ? ?

What is this for?

.

….….

The courtroom.

At the presiding judge's seat, Wang Jianjun listened to Su Bai's statement.

He frowned slightly and looked at the other two judges.

Zhou Yun and Zhu Chaoyang nodded slightly, and Wang Jianjun banged the gavel and spoke:

“Now let’s summarize the points of dispute between the litigant and the accused.”

"The litigant believes that the accused handed over the case to the prosecutor without substantive evidence, which does not comply with the process and has certain faults. It also believes that there are certain errors in its evidence."

"The prosecution believes that there is nothing wrong. The key point that there is no error is that DNA identification is the main evidence, and there are problems with the first-instance judgment through DNA identification."

“Does the prosecutor have anything to say?”

Kong Jiantu: It’s too late for me to hide, why are you talking? Did not say.

Kong Jiantu knew in his heart that nothing would happen to him in this court hearing.

If you talk too much, it will be other things.

So shut up or shut up.

"Presiding Judge, we have nothing to say."

Boom!

"Um!"

Wang Jianjun banged the gavel at the presiding judge's seat.

"The dispute between the two parties is whether the DNA test can constitute factual evidence to convict Lin Haoxue. Do the litigants and the accused have any objections to this point?"

Su Bai: "We have no objection."

Yan Xiangshang: "We have no objection."

"Well, neither side has any objection to this point, so let's plead on this point."

“Does the litigant have anything to raise?”

Su Bai said: "We question the authenticity of the DNA report submitted by the accused."

"We request the other party to confirm the complete process and accuracy of the DNA identification report to verify whether the DNA process violates regulations... and whether it is perjury!"

Boom, boom, boom!

"application passed!"

"Now please provide the accused with the accuracy of the true DNA report and the complete process."

"OK."

Yan nodded and spoke, then handed the prepared materials to the staff around him.

After the presiding judge Wang Jianjun read it, he immediately handed it over to Su Bai.

Su Bai just browsed it briefly and asked another question: "I would like to ask the defendant's attorney, how can you prove that this DNA report is not a forgery?"

"What do you mean? The authenticity of this DNA report has been verified by relevant agencies. There will be no problems. If you think there are any problems, you can conduct another verification."

Facing Yan Shang's explanation.

Su Bai stared closely at Yan Xiang's face.

You know how to pretend not to know, right?

Are you pretending not to understand on purpose...

Is this what I'm asking?

What I'm asking is, how do you know for sure whether your DNA report is a falsified process?

Be more specific.

Is this DNA report a frame-up? Don't pretend you don't understand!

ps: Please vote for me~

Thank you for the reward. Sorry, I originally wanted to do more today, but something suddenly happened...